The Kirtland Safety Society
A prophet-run 'anti-bank' that issued notes without a charter, collapsed within months, and split the Church.
What the Church claims
The bank was a reasonable community enterprise destroyed by the Panic of 1837 and by persecutors; Joseph never promised it would succeed by revelation.
Once the evidence is in, this claim: Contested. Illegality and recklessness are conceded; fraud and a formal 'prophecy' are not proven, and macro-economic conditions genuinely contributed.
The record
- The society's constitution set capital stock at $4 million (cut to $300,000 in the February 1837 charter petition); when the Ohio legislature would not charter it, it reorganized on 1837-01-02 as an unincorporated 'anti-banking company' and issued its own notes, in conflict with an 1816 Ohio statute.
- Joseph was cashier, then treasurer, and promoted it in the Church paper, saying that if the Saints were 'faithful' it would succeed and tying it to the redemption of Zion.
- Grandison Newell, through Samuel Rounds, filed qui tam suits in February 1837; in October 1837 a jury fined Joseph and Rigdon $1,000 each for unauthorized banking; the appeals were never perfected.
- The society 'ceased operations by August 1837'; Joseph resigned that summer; Joseph and Rigdon left Kirtland for Missouri on 1838-01-12.
- Warren Parrish, the society's clerk and later cashier, wrote in 1838 that Joseph had claimed $60,000 in specie in the vaults when there was under $6,000; the JSP editors note he was hostile and that no other source confirms the amounts.
- Dissent over the bank drove the 1837-38 apostasy of Parrish, Cowdery, the Whitmers and others; Heber C. Kimball later said scarcely twenty people would then have called Joseph a prophet.
The moving target
- 1837-08: Warned members against 'speculators, renegadoes and gamblers' circulating the notes.
- 2018-09: Presents the failure through dissenters' eyes ('mismanaged ... and cheated the Saints') and Parrish's expectation that 'a prophet should be more godly'.
- current: Attributes the failure largely to the Panic of 1837, land speculation and opposition; concedes the fine and the illegality.
The exchange
FAIR; Jeffrey Walker (BYU Studies 2015); Dale Adams
Many Ohio quasi-banks operated without charters; the legislature was refusing almost all charters; the Panic of 1837 sank half of the era's banks; Joseph invested more than nearly anyone and left with crushing debts, so there was no fraud.
The answer: The society failed in the first weeks of 1837, months before the national panic reached Ohio in May; its notes were backed largely by land valued at speculative prices. FAIR itself concedes proceeding without a charter 'was unwise and later found to violate Ohio banking law'. The complaint is not that Joseph enriched himself but that he used prophetic authority to sell the scheme and then blamed the losers.
What they get right: Walker's demonstration that Newell manipulated the litigation is convincing, and 'Joseph got rich' is a critic's overreach.
FAIR; JSP annotation
Joseph never prophesied that the bank could not fail; the 'prophecy' rests on Parrish, an embezzler and apostate.
The answer: Joseph's own printed promise that the society would succeed if the Saints were 'faithful', and his tying it to the redemption of Zion, put religious authority behind the venture. Whether he ever used the words 'never fail' matters less than that God's authority was invoked for a bank.
Both cases at full strength
The skeptics' case
A church leader launched a bank with a fictional $4 million capital, no charter and little specie, told his people God stood behind it, and saw it collapse inside a year, leaving members holding worthless paper. Courts fined him for illegal banking and he fled the state. The community's most trusted men - a Book of Mormon witness and the Prophet's own scribe - concluded he was not a prophet.
The apologetic case
Kirtland needed credit; wildcat banking was universal; the legislature's charter refusal was political; the nationwide panic destroyed sounder institutions; and Joseph personally lost more than almost anyone and spent years trying to repay debts.
What would change this
Evidence that the specie reserve was substantial or that Joseph made no revelatory claims for the venture.
Sources
- Saints, vol. 1, chapter 25, 'Move On to the West'
- Kirtland Safety Society (Church History Topics)
- Articles of Agreement for the Kirtland Safety Society Anti-Banking Company, 2 January 1837
- The Kirtland Safety Society and the Fraud of Grandison Newell: A Legal Examination
- Kirtland Safety Society (FAIR Answers)
- Kirtland Safety Society (Wikipedia; tertiary finder)
An independent project. Not affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or with any organization cited here. Summaries are written here; short quotations are attributed and linked. Every page names its sources so that it can be corrected, and every page can be challenged.